Arabidopsis thaliana protein interaction network
Laboratório de Biologia Integrativa e Sistêmica (LaBIS)
Find locus: show subcellular location show Ontology

Export PPI as  



AtPIN will be upgraded. Please send your suggestions here

AT1G24260 - ( SEP3 (SEPALLATA3) DNA binding / protein binding / transcription factor )

21 Proteins interacs with AT1G24260
LocusMethodFSW Cellular Compartment Classification (C3)Description
AT4G24540

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.5134

Class A:

nucleus

Class B:

cytosol

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AGL24 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 24) PROTEIN BINDING / PROTEIN HETERODIMERIZATION/ PROTEIN HOMODIMERIZATION/ SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT1G69120

Experimental

two hybrid

two hybrid

two hybrid

Affinity Capture-Western

inferred by author

FSW = 0.4859

Class A:

nucleus

Class B:

cytosol

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AP1 (APETALA1) DNA BINDING / PROTEIN BINDING / PROTEIN HETERODIMERIZATION/ TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR/ TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT1G26310

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.3218

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

cytosol (p = 0.67)

CAL (CAULIFLOWER) DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT3G57230

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.4840

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AGL16 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 16) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT5G23260

Experimental

two hybrid

two hybrid

3 hybrid method

3 hybrid method

FSW = 0.3472

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

TT16 (TRANSPARENT TESTA16) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT4G09960

Experimental

two hybrid

two hybrid

two hybrid

3 hybrid method

FSW = 0.3710

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

STK (SEEDSTICK) PROTEIN BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT5G14750

Experimental

FSW = 0.0667

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

ATMYB66 (MYB DOMAIN PROTEIN 66) DNA BINDING / PROTEIN BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR/ TRANSCRIPTION REGULATOR
AT4G18960

Experimental

two hybrid

two hybrid

Affinity Capture-Western

Reconstituted Complex

FSW = 0.4390

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AG (AGAMOUS) DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT3G44460

Experimental

FSW = 0.0803

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

DPBF2 DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR/ TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT2G42830

Experimental

two hybrid

two hybrid

two hybrid

FSW = 0.2571

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

SHP2 (SHATTERPROOF 2) PROTEIN BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT5G20240

Experimental

reverse two hybrid

FSW = 0.2603

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

PI (PISTILLATA) DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT4G32551

Experimental

pull down

FSW = 0.1177

Class A:

nucleus

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

LUG (LEUNIG) PROTEIN BINDING / PROTEIN HETERODIMERIZATION/ TRANSCRIPTION REPRESSOR
AT2G22540

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.3125

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

cytosol (p = 0.67)

SVP (SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR/ TRANSLATION REPRESSOR NUCLEIC ACID BINDING
AT3G58780

Experimental

two hybrid

two hybrid

two hybrid

3 hybrid method

3 hybrid method

3 hybrid method

FSW = 0.5185

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

cytosol (p = 0.67)

SHP1 (SHATTERPROOF 1) DNA BINDING / PROTEIN BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT2G45650

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.4678

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

cytosol (p = 0.67)

AGL6 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 6) DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT3G54340

Experimental

FSW = 0.2963

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AP3 (APETALA 3) DNA BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT1G43850

Experimental

pull down

two hybrid

pull down

FSW = 0.1634

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

SEU (SEUSS) DNA BINDING / PROTEIN BINDING / PROTEIN HETERODIMERIZATION/ TRANSCRIPTION COFACTOR
AT5G60910

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.3218

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AGL8 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 8) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT2G45660

Experimental

two hybrid

FSW = 0.4132

Class D:

nucleus (p = 0.78)

AGL20 (AGAMOUS-LIKE 20) TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT3G02310

Predicted

Gene fusion method

Co-expression

FSW = 0.5501

Class C:

nucleus

SEP2 (SEPALLATA 2) DNA BINDING / PROTEIN BINDING / TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
AT3G54610

Predicted

Phenotypic Enhancement

FSW = 0.0135

Class C:

nucleus

GCN5 DNA BINDING / H3 HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE/ HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE

Downloads

Fasta sequences:

Proteins

DNA

Quick help

Experimental: This means that the indicated PPI was experimentally demonstrated using Arabidopsis thaliana proteins as model of study. The experiment indicated links to the publication of which this interaction was annotated from
Predicted: The indicated PPI was proposed based on ortholgs studies. The experiment indicated links to the publication of the orthologous PPI was annotated from

FSW

FSW is the Functional Similarity Weight. It represents the proportion of interaction partners that two proteins have in common

Learn more - FSWeight top ranked cut offs

C3

Class A: The PPI is a direct evidence (experimental), the subcellular location was experimentally demonstrated and both, target and source, were indicated as expressed in same cellular compartment
Class B: The PPI is a direct evidence (experimental), the subcellular location was experimentally demonstrated but both, target and source, were indicated as expressed in different cellular compartment
Class C: Same as Class A but the PPI is predicted
Class D: Same as Class A but subcellular location was predicted. P(exp|pred) indicates the probability of this particular predicted location be experimentally demonstrated given all data available on AtPINDB
Unknown: There is no available data to calculate the C3 or the data does not fit onto any class previously described

PEP

PEP is the posterior probability of this particular PPI be experimentally demonstrated once it was predicted. For this release p = 0.0030. If they share same cell compartment p = 0.0029

Learn more

How to cite

If you find AtPIN interesting and want to use it in your work please cite us

AtPIN: Arabidopsis thaliana Protein Interaction Network
Marcelo M Brandao, Luiza L Dantas and Marcio C Silva-Filho
BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:454

DOI:1471-2105/10/454