Arabidopsis thaliana protein interaction network
Laboratório de Biologia Integrativa e Sistêmica (LaBIS)
Find locus: show subcellular location show Ontology

Export PPI as  



AtPIN will be upgraded. Please send your suggestions here

AT2G16120 - ( mannitol transporter putative )

14 Proteins interacs with AT2G16120
LocusMethodFSW Cellular Compartment Classification (C3)Description
AT2G48020

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.5877

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT1G11260

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.3297

Unknown

STP1 (SUGAR TRANSPORTER 1) CARBOHYDRATE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ SUGARHYDROGEN SYMPORTER
AT5G59250

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.5752

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER FAMILY PROTEIN
AT3G18830

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.5877

Unknown

ATPLT5 (POLYOL TRANSPORTER 5) D-RIBOSE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ D-XYLOSE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ CARBOHYDRATE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ GALACTOSE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ GLUCOSE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ GLYCEROL TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ MANN
AT4G02050

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.5752

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT3G19940

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.1988

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT5G18840

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6144

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT3G05400

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6932

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT2G18480

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6437

Unknown

MANNITOL TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT4G04750

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6287

Unknown

CARBOHYDRATE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ SUGARHYDROGEN SYMPORTER
AT1G08930

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6437

Unknown

ERD6 (EARLY RESPONSE TO DEHYDRATION 6) CARBOHYDRATE TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ SUGAR TRANSMEMBRANE TRANSPORTER/ SUGARHYDROGEN SYMPORTER
AT1G05030

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6008

Unknown

HEXOSE TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT1G54730

Predicted

Phylogenetic profile method

FSW = 0.6287

Unknown

SUGAR TRANSPORTER PUTATIVE
AT1G73720

Predicted

Gene fusion method

FSW = 0.0448

Unknown

TRANSDUCIN FAMILY PROTEIN / WD-40 REPEAT FAMILY PROTEIN

Downloads

Fasta sequences:

Proteins

DNA

Quick help

Experimental: This means that the indicated PPI was experimentally demonstrated using Arabidopsis thaliana proteins as model of study. The experiment indicated links to the publication of which this interaction was annotated from
Predicted: The indicated PPI was proposed based on ortholgs studies. The experiment indicated links to the publication of the orthologous PPI was annotated from

FSW

FSW is the Functional Similarity Weight. It represents the proportion of interaction partners that two proteins have in common

Learn more - FSWeight top ranked cut offs

C3

Class A: The PPI is a direct evidence (experimental), the subcellular location was experimentally demonstrated and both, target and source, were indicated as expressed in same cellular compartment
Class B: The PPI is a direct evidence (experimental), the subcellular location was experimentally demonstrated but both, target and source, were indicated as expressed in different cellular compartment
Class C: Same as Class A but the PPI is predicted
Class D: Same as Class A but subcellular location was predicted. P(exp|pred) indicates the probability of this particular predicted location be experimentally demonstrated given all data available on AtPINDB
Unknown: There is no available data to calculate the C3 or the data does not fit onto any class previously described

PEP

PEP is the posterior probability of this particular PPI be experimentally demonstrated once it was predicted. For this release p = 0.0030. If they share same cell compartment p = 0.0029

Learn more

How to cite

If you find AtPIN interesting and want to use it in your work please cite us

AtPIN: Arabidopsis thaliana Protein Interaction Network
Marcelo M Brandao, Luiza L Dantas and Marcio C Silva-Filho
BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:454

DOI:1471-2105/10/454